Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1349

reference
933-tree-1
name
1349
tree-preservation-order

undefined

933-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.032683 50.876987)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.032569 50.876975,-1.032574 50.876997,-1.032590 50.877017,-1.032615 50.877033,-1.032646 50.877044,-1.032681 50.877047,-1.032717 50.877044,-1.032749 50.877034,-1.032774 50.877019,-1.032791 50.876999,-1.032797 50.876976,-1.032792 50.876954,-1.032776 50.876934,-1.032751 50.876918,-1.032720 50.876907,-1.032684 50.876904,-1.032649 50.876907,-1.032617 50.876917,-1.032592 50.876932,-1.032575 50.876952,-1.032569 50.876975)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL